Explore the WHO leadership framework for healthcare executives. Understand global health competencies, patient safety leadership, and evidence-based management frameworks from WHO.
Written by Laura Bouttell • Mon 5th January 2026
The WHO leadership framework represents the World Health Organization's evidence-based approach to developing healthcare leadership competencies addressing global health challenges. As healthcare systems worldwide face unprecedented pressures—pandemic preparedness, aging populations, technological disruption, resource constraints, health equity demands—leadership quality increasingly determines organisational and population health outcomes. Research demonstrates that healthcare organisations with strong leadership capabilities achieve 28% better patient safety metrics, 34% higher staff engagement, and 23% improved clinical outcomes compared to those with weaker leadership.
Yet here's the uncomfortable reality WHO's framework implicitly acknowledges: most healthcare systems remain better at clinical training than leadership development. Physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals receive extensive technical education whilst leadership competencies—strategic thinking, change management, systems improvement, stakeholder engagement—develop haphazardly if at all. This creates healthcare organisations led by clinically brilliant individuals lacking managerial competencies their roles demand.
This article examines WHO's leadership frameworks, exploring the competency models, specialised frameworks for patient safety and public health, and practical applications for healthcare executives seeking to enhance leadership capabilities aligned with global standards.
The WHO Global Competency Model provides comprehensive framework defining the capabilities required of WHO staff across all levels and functions. Whilst developed initially for WHO's workforce, the model's evidence-based approach makes it valuable reference for healthcare leaders worldwide.
The WHO Global Competency Model identifies three groups of competencies: Core, Managerial, and Leadership, with each competency including behavioural indicators required of staff members by the organisation in particular job levels and grades.
Core Competencies: Fundamental capabilities expected of all healthcare professionals regardless of position:
These competencies establish baseline expectations—the minimum capability set for effective organisational contribution.
Managerial Competencies: Capabilities required of those supervising others or managing programmes:
Managerial competencies bridge individual contribution and strategic leadership—translating organisational strategies into operational execution whilst developing team capabilities.
Leadership Competencies: Strategic capabilities required of senior executives shaping organisational direction:
Leadership competencies focus on adaptation and renewal—ensuring organisations evolve to meet changing population needs, technological capabilities, and environmental realities.
WHO's model recognises that competency expectations increase with organisational level. Junior staff demonstrate core competencies in straightforward contexts; senior staff deploy the same competencies in complex, ambiguous situations with broader impact. Managerial and leadership competencies similarly progress from tactical to strategic applications.
This progression acknowledges leadership development as continuous journey rather than binary state—individuals don't suddenly "become leaders" through promotion but rather expand capability scope and complexity throughout careers.
The WHO's Leadership Competencies Framework on Patient Safety and Quality of Care provides specialised competency model addressing healthcare's unique challenge: delivering safe, effective care within complex systems where errors can prove fatal.
This framework identifies competencies and areas necessary for organisational leadership and management of health services, balancing three domains:
Personal Attributes represent the personal characteristics and values of leaders needed to oversee complex, organisation-wide, and long-term initiatives. These include:
Personal attributes prove difficult to teach yet critical for sustained leadership effectiveness. Leaders lacking integrity eventually lose trust; those without self-awareness make preventable errors; those deficient in emotional intelligence alienate teams; those missing resilience burn out.
Healthcare particularly demands these attributes—clinical decisions affect patient lives, resource constraints force difficult trade-offs, regulatory scrutiny proves intense, and public expectations continue rising. Leaders without robust personal foundations crack under these pressures.
Core Functions of Leadership represent leaders' knowledge and skills to perform leadership functions which they are accountable for. These include:
Strategic Planning and Execution:
Quality and Safety Systems Development:
Stakeholder Engagement and Communication:
Workforce Development:
These core functions translate leadership intent into organisational capability. Vision without execution systems fails; quality commitments without measurement remain aspirational; strategies without stakeholder engagement face resistance; organisations without workforce development cannot sustain performance.
Ability to Execute represents leaders' motivation and capability to establish evidence-based policies, systems, mechanisms, and processes to improve safety and quality in their organisation or facility. This domain emphasises implementation—the gap where many healthcare improvement initiatives fail.
Evidence-Informed Decision-Making:
Change Management:
Systems Thinking:
Results Orientation:
The execution domain acknowledges that healthcare leadership ultimately proves itself through results—improved patient outcomes, enhanced safety, greater efficiency, higher satisfaction. Personal attributes and leadership functions provide foundations, but execution capability delivers value.
The WHO framework emphasises balance across domains—excellence in any single domain cannot compensate for deficiency in others. Leaders with admirable personal attributes but weak core functions inspire followership without organisational impact. Those with strong functional knowledge but poor execution capability develop excellent plans never implemented. Those focused solely on execution without personal credibility or strategic functions optimise locally whilst missing broader opportunities.
Effective healthcare leadership integrates all three domains—personal credibility enabling influence, strategic and functional knowledge providing direction, and execution capability delivering results.
Beyond the general competency model, WHO has developed specialised leadership frameworks addressing specific healthcare domains where leadership proves particularly critical.
The WHO Laboratory Leadership Competency Framework (2019) outlines essential competencies needed for laboratory leaders to build sustainable national laboratory systems improving disease detection, control, and prevention efforts in health systems worldwide.
Laboratory leadership receives less attention than clinical or executive leadership despite laboratories' critical roles in diagnosis, surveillance, and research. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted this gap—laboratory capacity often determined countries' pandemic response effectiveness.
Framework Components:
This framework recognises that laboratory leadership requires both scientific credibility and managerial competence—laboratory directors must understand the science deeply whilst possessing business acumen managing complex operations.
The WHO Global Competency Framework for Universal Health Coverage (2022) identifies health worker competencies organised within six domains: people-centredness, decision-making, communication, collaboration, evidence-informed practice, and personal conduct.
Universal Health Coverage (UHC)—ensuring all people receive needed health services without financial hardship—represents WHO's primary strategic objective. Achieving UHC requires workforce transformation, as health workers' behaviours directly determine whether services prove accessible, appropriate, and effective.
The Six Competency Domains:
1. People-Centredness: Prioritising patients', families', and communities' perspectives, preferences, and needs throughout service design and delivery
2. Decision-Making: Making sound clinical and operational choices based on evidence, patient values, and contextual factors
3. Communication: Conveying information clearly, listening actively, and adapting communication approaches to audiences and contexts
4. Collaboration: Working effectively across professions, organisations, and sectors addressing complex health challenges
5. Evidence-Informed Practice: Accessing, appraising, and applying research evidence whilst acknowledging uncertainty and evolving knowledge
6. Personal Conduct: Demonstrating professionalism, ethical behaviour, cultural sensitivity, and commitment to continuous learning
This framework applies across all health workforce categories—physicians, nurses, midwives, allied health professionals, community health workers, support staff. Whilst technical competencies vary by profession, these core domains prove universal.
Leadership Implications: Healthcare executives must ensure workforce development addresses these competencies systematically rather than assuming they develop automatically through clinical experience. This requires:
The WHO Global Competency and Outcomes Framework for Essential Public Health Functions (2024) provides evidence-based guidance and international reference set of competencies and educational outcomes for delivering essential public health functions.
Public health leadership differs from clinical healthcare leadership—the former addresses population health through prevention, health promotion, and systems improvement rather than individual patient care. This requires distinctive competencies:
Population Health Assessment: Analysing health status, determinants, and inequities across populations
Health Protection: Preventing and controlling communicable diseases, environmental hazards, and other health threats
Health Promotion: Enabling communities to increase control over health determinants
Health Systems Strengthening: Improving governance, financing, workforce, information systems, supply chains, and service delivery
Intersectoral Collaboration: Partnering across government sectors, civil society, and private sector addressing social determinants of health
Public health leaders operate in politically complex environments where health improvements often depend on sectors outside healthcare—housing, education, transport, environment, employment. This demands competencies in policy analysis, stakeholder engagement, advocacy, and systems thinking that clinical healthcare leadership may neglect.
Understanding WHO frameworks benefits from comparing them to other prominent healthcare leadership competency models developed by national and international organisations.
The International Hospital Federation developed a global healthcare leadership competency model through international participation and consensus, last updated in 2023. This model represents seven core leadership and management competencies:
Comparison to WHO Framework: The IHF model emphasises managerial and operational competencies reflecting hospital executives' responsibilities for complex organisations. WHO frameworks incorporate broader public health perspectives—population health, health equity, intersectoral collaboration—reflecting WHO's mandate beyond hospital care.
Canada's LEADS framework represents one of the most widely adopted healthcare leadership models internationally. LEADS constitutes acronym representing five domains:
L - Lead Self: Self-awareness, managing yourself, developing yourself, demonstrating character
E - Engage Others: Fostering development of others, contributing to creation of healthy organisations, communicating effectively, building teams
A - Achieve Results: Setting direction, strategically aligning decisions with vision, taking action to implement decisions, assessing and evaluating outcomes
D - Develop Coalitions: Building partnerships and networks, demonstrating systems/political acumen, navigating socio-political environments
S - Systems Transformation: Demonstrating systems/critical thinking, encouraging and supporting innovation, strategically orienting to the future, championing and orchestrating change
Comparison to WHO Framework: LEADS emphasises systems transformation and coalition development more explicitly than WHO's general competency model, reflecting Canada's federated healthcare system requiring extensive cross-jurisdictional collaboration. However, WHO's patient safety framework incorporates similar systems thinking within its execution domain.
The NHS Leadership Academy's Healthcare Leadership Model identifies nine leadership dimensions organised in three groups:
Personal Qualities:
Working with Others:
Managing Services:
Comparison to WHO Framework: The NHS model shows remarkable alignment with WHO's three-domain patient safety framework—personal qualities correspond to personal attributes, working with others aligns with leadership core functions, and managing services parallels execution capability. This convergence suggests international consensus emerging around essential healthcare leadership competencies.
Despite different contexts and organisational mandates, healthcare leadership frameworks demonstrate convergence around core themes:
| Competency Area | WHO | IHF | LEADS | NHS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-Awareness & Personal Development | Personal Attributes | Professionalism | Lead Self | Personal Qualities |
| Strategic Thinking & Vision | Core Functions | Evidence-Informed Decision-Making | Achieve Results | Managing Services |
| People Leadership & Development | Core Functions | Leading People | Engage Others | Working with Others |
| Change Management | Execution | Enabling Change | Systems Transformation | Managing Services |
| Collaboration & Partnerships | Core Functions | Relationship Management | Develop Coalitions | Working with Others |
| Quality & Safety Focus | Core Functions | Operations Management | Achieve Results | Managing Services |
| Evidence-Based Practice | Execution | Evidence-Informed Decision-Making | Achieve Results | Evaluating Information |
This convergence validates core competency domains whilst acknowledging contextual variations in emphasis and application.
Understanding WHO frameworks provides limited value without translation to practical leadership development and organisational improvement. How do healthcare organisations implement these models?
Self-Assessment Against Framework: Begin by evaluating current capabilities against WHO competency model. Which domains demonstrate strength? Which require development? Honest assessment—ideally incorporating 360-degree feedback from supervisors, peers, and subordinates—identifies priority development areas.
Targeted Development Planning: Create focused development plans addressing identified gaps:
Experiential Learning: Competency development requires practice beyond classroom instruction. Seek stretch assignments challenging underdeveloped competencies—lead quality improvement initiative for strategic thinking practice, chair cross-departmental committee for coalition building, mentor junior staff for people development.
Mentorship and Peer Learning: Connect with experienced leaders exemplifying target competencies. Observe their approaches, discuss challenges, receive guidance navigating complex situations. Additionally, participate in peer learning groups where fellow leaders share experiences and provide mutual support.
Competency-Based Recruitment and Selection: Incorporate WHO framework competencies into position descriptions, interview protocols, and selection criteria. Rather than hiring based solely on clinical credentials or previous titles, assess candidates' demonstrated competencies through behavioural interviewing, case analysis, and reference checking focused on framework domains.
Performance Management Integration: Align performance expectations and evaluation criteria with competency frameworks. Rather than vague expectations like "demonstrate leadership," specify behaviours indicating competency development: "Builds coalitions across departments advancing shared quality objectives" or "Uses evidence systematically informing strategic decisions."
Succession Planning: Identify high-potential leaders early, providing progressive responsibility increases developing requisite competencies before they assume senior roles. Too often, healthcare organisations promote excellent clinicians to leadership positions without ensuring leadership competency development, creating stressed leaders and underperforming organisations.
Leadership Pipeline Development: Create structured pathways moving individuals from emerging leaders (developing core competencies) through middle management (building managerial competencies) to senior executives (demonstrating strategic leadership). Each level requires distinct development experiences preparing for next stage.
Leadership competency frameworks cannot succeed within organisational cultures undermining competency expression. Consider these common disconnects:
Framework emphasises collaboration; organisation rewards individual achievement: Incentive systems prioritising individual performance metrics discourage the partnership-building and coalition development frameworks advocate.
Framework stresses evidence-informed decision-making; organisation makes decisions politically: If resource allocation, strategic priorities, and policy decisions reflect power dynamics rather than evidence, staff learn that analytical capability matters less than political acumen.
Framework values continuous learning; organisation punishes mistakes: Cultures prioritising error avoidance over innovation prevent the experimentation and risk-taking required for systems transformation.
Implementing WHO frameworks requires examining organisational systems—governance, resource allocation, performance management, communication patterns—identifying misalignments, and deliberately redesigning systems reinforcing desired competencies.
Whilst WHO frameworks provide valuable guidance, honest assessment requires acknowledging limitations and implementation challenges.
WHO frameworks aspire to global applicability yet inevitably reflect Western organisational assumptions—individual accountability, participatory decision-making, transparent communication, merit-based advancement. Healthcare systems in different cultural contexts may operate according to alternative principles—collective responsibility, hierarchical decision-making, indirect communication, seniority-based advancement.
Implementing WHO frameworks in such contexts requires cultural adaptation whilst preserving core principles. The challenge lies distinguishing genuine cultural differences from convenient justifications for poor practices. Transparency and accountability represent universal healthcare leadership requirements, yet their expression may vary culturally.
WHO frameworks assume organisational capacity for systematic leadership development—dedicated training programmes, coaching resources, protected time for learning, succession planning processes. Many healthcare systems, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, operate with constrained resources making comprehensive implementation challenging.
This creates ironic situation: healthcare systems most needing strong leadership often possess fewest resources for leadership development. Practical implementation may require simplified approaches—peer learning circles replacing expensive training, mentorship substituting for coaching, action learning through quality improvement rather than separate development programmes.
Competency frameworks prove easier to articulate than measure. How does one objectively assess "systems thinking" or "emotional intelligence"? Behavioural indicators provide some structure, yet competency evaluation remains substantially subjective. This creates challenges for performance management, promotion decisions, and development effectiveness assessment.
Moreover, competency demonstration in low-pressure, controlled environments may not predict performance during crises when leadership proves most critical. The leader who facilitates excellent strategic planning retreats may freeze during actual emergencies.
Perhaps the most significant limitation involves the gap between frameworks as written and leadership as practised. Organisations may formally adopt competency frameworks whilst continuing business as usual—promoting based on clinical reputation rather than leadership competency, tolerating toxic leaders who deliver financial results, ignoring evidence when politically inconvenient.
Framework adoption provides necessary but insufficient condition for leadership improvement. Genuine change requires sustained commitment, accountability for competency development, systems alignment reinforcing desired behaviours, and cultural transformation making frameworks lived reality rather than aspirational documents.
The WHO leadership framework represents the World Health Organization's evidence-based competency model defining capabilities required for effective healthcare leadership. The framework comprises three competency groups: Core competencies expected of all healthcare professionals (teamwork, communication, producing results); Managerial competencies required of supervisors (leading, decision-making, managing performance); and Leadership competencies needed by senior executives (vision, strategic thinking, change leadership, innovation). Additionally, WHO has developed specialised frameworks including the Leadership Competencies Framework on Patient Safety featuring three domains—Personal Attributes, Core Functions of Leadership, and Ability to Execute. These frameworks guide leadership development, recruitment, performance management, and succession planning in healthcare organisations worldwide.
WHO's Leadership Competencies Framework on Patient Safety and Quality of Care identifies three balanced domains essential for healthcare leadership. First, Personal Attributes represent the personal characteristics and values leaders need for overseeing complex initiatives, including integrity, self-awareness, emotional intelligence, resilience, and commitment to quality. Second, Core Functions of Leadership encompass leaders' knowledge and skills for performing accountable functions like setting vision for quality and safety, strategic planning, stakeholder engagement, and workforce development. Third, Ability to Execute represents leaders' motivation and capability to establish evidence-based policies, systems, and processes actually improving safety and quality. Effective healthcare leadership requires balance across all three domains—personal credibility, strategic and functional knowledge, and execution capability delivering measurable patient outcomes.
The WHO leadership framework demonstrates substantial convergence with other prominent healthcare leadership models whilst maintaining distinctive emphases. The International Hospital Federation's model focuses heavily on operational and managerial competencies reflecting hospital executives' organisational responsibilities. Canada's LEADS framework explicitly emphasises systems transformation and coalition development reflecting federated healthcare requiring cross-jurisdictional collaboration. The NHS Healthcare Leadership Model organises competencies into Personal Qualities, Working with Others, and Managing Services showing remarkable alignment with WHO's three-domain patient safety framework. Despite contextual variations, all frameworks converge around core themes: self-awareness and personal development, strategic thinking, people leadership, change management, collaboration, quality focus, and evidence-based practice. This international consensus validates essential healthcare leadership competencies whilst allowing contextual adaptation.
Healthcare leaders can implement WHO frameworks through individual development and organisational systems approaches. For individual development: conduct honest self-assessment against framework competencies using 360-degree feedback; create targeted development plans addressing gaps through coaching, executive education, and training; pursue experiential learning through stretch assignments and action learning projects; engage mentors exemplifying target competencies. For organisational implementation: incorporate framework competencies into recruitment, selection, and promotion decisions; align performance management expectations and evaluation with competency domains; develop succession planning and leadership pipelines providing progressive responsibility; examine organisational systems—governance, incentives, resource allocation—identifying misalignments with framework principles; redesign cultures and processes reinforcing desired competency expression. Successful implementation requires sustained commitment beyond formal framework adoption.
WHO emphasises competencies extending beyond clinical healthcare to address population health and health systems strengthening. The Global Competency Framework for Universal Health Coverage identifies six core domains: people-centredness prioritising communities' needs and preferences, evidence-informed decision-making, effective communication across diverse stakeholders, collaboration across professions and sectors, evidence-informed practice, and professional conduct. The Global Competency Framework for Essential Public Health Functions addresses population health assessment, health protection, health promotion, health systems strengthening, and intersectoral collaboration. These frameworks recognise that health improvements often depend on sectors beyond healthcare—housing, education, employment, environment—requiring competencies in policy analysis, stakeholder engagement, advocacy, and systems thinking that clinical leadership may neglect. Global health leadership operates in politically complex environments demanding sophisticated navigation of diverse interests.
Whilst developed specifically for healthcare contexts, WHO leadership frameworks incorporate universal leadership principles applicable across sectors with appropriate adaptation. Core competencies like teamwork, communication, resource stewardship, and results orientation prove relevant in any organisational context. Managerial competencies including leading people, decision-making, and performance management translate readily to non-healthcare settings. Leadership competencies emphasising vision, strategic thinking, and change management represent fundamental leadership capabilities regardless of industry. However, healthcare-specific elements—patient safety focus, clinical quality emphasis, health equity orientation, evidence-based practice in clinical contexts—require translation for other sectors. The frameworks' value for non-healthcare leaders lies in their comprehensive, evidence-based approach to leadership competency identification and development rather than specific healthcare content. Organisations seeking rigorous leadership frameworks can adapt WHO models to their contexts.
WHO leadership frameworks face several limitations affecting implementation effectiveness. Cultural adaptability challenges arise as frameworks reflect Western organisational assumptions potentially conflicting with alternative cultural principles around hierarchy, communication, and decision-making. Resource constraints particularly affect low- and middle-income countries lacking capacity for systematic leadership development programmes, coaching, and protected learning time the frameworks assume. Measurement difficulties emerge as competencies like systems thinking and emotional intelligence prove easier to articulate than objectively assess, complicating performance evaluation and development effectiveness measurement. The implementation-aspiration gap represents perhaps the most significant limitation—organisations may formally adopt frameworks whilst continuing problematic practices like promoting based on clinical reputation rather than leadership competency or tolerating toxic leaders delivering financial results. Framework adoption provides necessary but insufficient condition for improvement, requiring sustained commitment, accountability systems, cultural transformation, and alignment of organisational incentives with framework principles.
The WHO leadership framework and associated competency models provide comprehensive, evidence-based guidance for developing healthcare leadership capabilities addressing contemporary challenges—pandemic preparedness, aging populations, technological transformation, resource constraints, and persistent health inequities. From the general Global Competency Model distinguishing core, managerial, and leadership capabilities to specialised frameworks addressing patient safety, laboratory leadership, universal health coverage, and public health functions, WHO offers structured approaches replacing ad hoc leadership development with systematic capability building.
The frameworks' strength lies in their balance—recognising that effective healthcare leadership requires personal attributes providing credibility and resilience, core leadership functions establishing strategic direction and organisational systems, and execution capability translating intentions into measurable improvements in patient outcomes, safety, and population health. Too often, healthcare organisations promote clinically excellent individuals lacking leadership competencies, creating stressed leaders and underperforming organisations. WHO frameworks provide roadmaps identifying capabilities required before, during, and after leadership transitions.
International convergence across WHO, IHF, LEADS, NHS, and other healthcare leadership models validates core competency domains whilst acknowledging contextual variations. Healthcare leaders worldwide face similar challenges requiring comparable capabilities—strategic thinking, people development, change management, collaboration, evidence-based practice—regardless of whether they operate in Singapore, Stockholm, or São Paulo. This consensus enables cross-border learning, international leadership development standards, and evidence-based approaches replacing leadership mythology with systematic capability building.
However, frameworks alone prove insufficient. Implementation requires sustained organisational commitment translating aspirational documents into lived reality through recruitment emphasising leadership competencies, performance management holding leaders accountable for competency demonstration, succession planning developing capabilities before promoting individuals to senior roles, and cultural transformation aligning incentives, resource allocation, and decision-making processes with framework principles. Too many healthcare organisations formally adopt competency frameworks whilst continuing business as usual—the implementation-aspiration gap that undermines framework value.
For healthcare executives seeking to enhance leadership capabilities, begin with honest self-assessment against WHO framework domains. Which competencies demonstrate strength? Which require development? Engage 360-degree feedback revealing how your self-perception aligns with others' experiences. Create focused development plans combining formal education, experiential learning through stretch assignments, coaching addressing specific competency gaps, and mentorship from leaders exemplifying target capabilities.
For healthcare organisations seeking systematic leadership improvement, examine current systems—recruitment, performance management, succession planning, resource allocation—identifying misalignments with WHO framework principles. Redesign processes incorporating competency assessment, development, and accountability. Perhaps most importantly, investigate organisational culture: Do incentive systems reward the collaboration frameworks advocate or individual achievement? Do decision-making processes reflect the evidence-based practice frameworks emphasise or political convenience? Does the organisation punish the mistakes inevitable during the innovation and change frameworks require? Cultural alignment determines whether frameworks transform leadership or gather dust on virtual shelves.
The opportunity cost of neglecting systematic leadership development proves substantial—healthcare organisations lacking strong leadership deliver poorer patient outcomes, experience lower staff engagement, demonstrate reduced innovation, and struggle adapting to environmental changes. Yet healthcare leadership development often receives far less investment than clinical training despite leadership's profound impact on organisational and population health.
WHO leadership frameworks eliminate excuses—comprehensive, evidence-based competency models exist, validated through international consensus and healthcare system experience globally. The question facing healthcare executives and organisations isn't "What capabilities does effective leadership require?" but rather "Will we commit to developing these capabilities systematically?" Begin implementing WHO frameworks today, transforming healthcare leadership from accidental to intentional, from ad hoc to systematic, from aspirational to measurable.
Sources: